While other contemporary Islamic militant groups have stated similar objectives for establishing an Islamic caliphate, 4 ISIL is unique in that it has made significant progress in pursuit of that goal by seizing control of large amounts of territory in Iraq and Syria. When ISIL initiated large-scale offensive operations into Iraq in early June 2014, it propelled itself onto the global stage. 3 Findings of the analyses will be critically compared to produce recommendations for changes in joint doctrine COG determination. Butler’s Godzilla COG methodology, and the Critical Factors Analysis, outlined in the JOPP. Eikmeier’s COG determination method, James P. To accomplish this objective, three different COG methodologies are applied to the current Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) 2 problem set: Dale C. Therefore, the objective of this article is to compare and contrast different COG determination methodologies to reveal strengths and weaknesses of each and ultimately to make recommendations for changes to joint doctrine. Speculation on proper COG determination has given rise to other COG methodologies, which have both questioned and challenged established doctrine for COG determination. Currently, the definition of center of gravity and the process for determining it are outlined in joint doctrine, specifically in Joint Publication (JP) 1, Doctrine for the Armed Forces of the United States, JP 3-0, Joint Operations, and JP 5-0, Joint Operation Planning, as encompassed in the Joint Operation Planning Process (JOPP) within those publications. Since its inception as a core planning tenet, the process for determining COGs has been a point of contention and debate. Air Force F-22 Raptor aircraft after conducting airstrikes in Syria as part of large coalition to strike Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant targets, September 2014 (DOD/Jefferson S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |